Selecting inductors for BUCK DC/DC regulators

nPM1300 and nPM1304 Hardware Design Guidelines

The buck regulators are designed to operate with inductors that have a nominal inductance of 2.2 µH with ± 20% tolerance. To ensure loop stability, do not use inductors with other nominal inductances.

The saturation current of the inductor should be greater than 400 mA. This saturation current requirement should be respected even if the load current range required in the application during design is lower than the maximum load current of the buck regulator. This is because the inductor peak current level is higher than the load current, especially when the buck regulator operates in hysteretic mode.

The choice of inductor has a significant effect on the performance of the buck regulator, especially the efficiency. The choice is typically a compromise between size, performance, and cost. The Direct Current Resistance (DCR) given by the manufacturer is one key indicator of the performance. However, the DCR is not a definitive performance metric as the losses in the inductor also include various frequency-dependent effects like magnetic hysteresis losses, eddy currents, and skin effects.

The following table shows examples of inductor models selected for area, performance, and cost optimized applications.

Table 1. Inductor examples
Manufacturer Part number Package (metric) Height (mm) DCR max (mΩ) Comment
Taiyo Yuden LSCNB1608HKT2R2MD 1608 0.8 292 Small footprint, thin
Taiyo Yuden MDKK1616T2R2MM 1616 1 250 Small footprint
TDK VLS201610HBX-2R2M-1 2016 1 142 Good performance
TDK MLP2016H2R2MT0S1 2016 1 170 Good performance
Samsung Electro-Mechanics CIGT201610EH2R2MNE 2016 1 87 Good performance
Samsung Electro-Mechanics CIGT252008LM2R2MNE 2520 0.8 97 Good performance, inexpensive, thin

The following table shows a comparison of buck efficiencies for different inductor manufacturer and models at 3.0 V output voltage. Efficiency numbers were measured by using the nPM1300 Evaluation Kit (EK) with default components and different buck inductors. The input current used in the efficiency calculations includes the whole device battery current.

Table 2. BUCK1 efficiency comparison with VIN = 3.8 V, VOUT1 = 3.0 V
Manufacturer Part number Package (metric) Pulse Width Modulation (PWM) efficiency (%) at 150 mA
Samsung Electro-Mechanics CIGT252008LM2R2MNE 2520 92.8
TDK MLP2016H2R2MT0S1 2016 92.7
TDK VLS201610HBX-2R2M-1 2016 92.6
TDK MLZ2012M2R2HT000 2012 92.6
TDK TFM201610ALMA2R2MTAA 2016 92.5
Wurth 74479275222 2012 92.5
Murata LQM21PN2R2MEHD 2012 92.5
Murata LQM21PN2R2MCAD 2012 92.4
Taiyo Yuden MDKK1616T2R2MM 1616 92.4
TDK MLZ2012A2R2WTD25 2012 92.3
TDK MLP2012V2R2MT0S1 2012 92.3
Murata LQM18PN2R2MGHD 1608 92.3
Taiyo Yuden LSCN1608HKT2R2MD 1608 92.2
Samsung Electro-Mechanics CIGT201610EH2R2MNE 2016 92.2
TDK MLP2012S2RR2MT0S1 2012 92.2
Wurth 74479763222 1608 92.0
Taiyo Yuden LSBHB1608KK2R2M 1608 91.8
Taiyo Yuden MBKK1608T2R2M 1608 91.8
Murata LQM21PN2R2MC0D 2012 91.7
Murata LQM18PN2R2MDHD 1608 91.7
NJ MIPSDZ1608G2R2PA 1608 91.6
TDK MLZ1608A2R2WT000 1608 91.3

The following graph shows the typical efficiencies for BUCK1 in PWM mode.

Figure 1. Typical efficiency for BUCK1 using inductor VLS201610HBX-2R2M in PWM mode and VBAT = 3.8 V
Typical efficiency for BUCK1 using inductor VLS201610HBX-2R2M in PWM mode and VBAT = 3.8 V